Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images

In an odd occurrence, Democratic Senator and presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren went to Twitter to admit to the world that the Democratic impeachment managers have not presented any evidence against the President.

Senator Warren stated, “the evidence against Donald Trump will not be hidden forever. On day one as president, I will order the release of every document related to this impeachment inquiry. The American people deserve to know the truth.”

Following Senator Warren’s admission that the Democrats have presented no evidence against President Trump, was Senator Durbin admitting the same thing.


With Senator Durbin’s admission that “it is not a real trial without real evidence and witnesses,” the Democratic Senators should do the right thing and vote with their Republican colleagues to end this sham impeachment.

Unfortunately, Senator Warren will never do the right thing; if she did, it would further damage her already failing presidential campaign.

Hillary Addicted to Running for President: Feels ‘the Urge’ to Run in 2020

Previous article

Biden Says There’s a Good Chance He Would Die in Office, Says His VP Must Be Ready

Next article

18 Comments

  1. Sherrod Brown also said that. LOL. I guess the House witnesses who were quoted by the managers weren’t “real witnesses.” Perhaps they were actors.

  2. Senator Warren, wouldn’t know the truth if it came up and bit her on the buttocks.

  3. The House Democrats had their opportunity to provide witnesses to prove their case. to then ask the Senate to do the job they didn’t do is outlandishly rediculous. this is like while the jury in a legal case is deliberating after a trial the defense claims they need more evidence.

  4. Sherrod Brown also said that. LOL. I guess the House witnesses who were quoted by the managers weren’t “real witnesses.” Perhaps they were actors.

  5. Senator Warren, wouldn’t know the truth if it came up and bit her on the buttocks.

  6. The House Democrats had their opportunity to provide witnesses to prove their case. to then ask the Senate to do the job they didn’t do is outlandishly rediculous. this is like while the jury in a legal case is deliberating after a trial the defense claims they need more evidence.

  7. I wonder if that hidden “evidence” she’s talking about releasing includes the Atkinson testimony that Schifty the Liar is withholding.

  8. I wonder if that hidden “evidence” she’s talking about releasing includes the Atkinson testimony that Schifty the Liar is withholding.

  9. This is a sham and hoax and a witch hunt. Crafty + Demons = Democrats. period.
    They are the power-hungry hate mongers and abusers of power in every which way.

  10. The dem party today, are all actors and very Bad ones at that.
    Its mind boggling, after all the absolute facts brought out by President Trumps defense team, all the dems lies totally debunked, that they still push for impeachment and their fake news minions do the exact same, they are very sick lawless anti-American, anti-Christ, treasonous, projectionist people, acting like mindless zombies!

  11. This is a sham and hoax and a witch hunt. Crafty + Demons = Democrats. period.
    They are the power-hungry hate mongers and abusers of power in every which way.

  12. The dem party today, are all actors and very Bad ones at that.
    Its mind boggling, after all the absolute facts brought out by President Trumps defense team, all the dems lies totally debunked, that they still push for impeachment and their fake news minions do the exact same, they are very sick lawless anti-American, anti-Christ, treasonous, projectionist people, acting like mindless zombies!

  13. HUMMM !! Squaw woman speak with so many forks in tongue, she not able to see what truth look like. Her main problem is to get elected in first place.

  14. HUMMM !! Squaw woman speak with so many forks in tongue, she not able to see what truth look like. Her main problem is to get elected in first place.

  15. What the Dems did is ILLEGAL. And it’s in the Constitution as such. In 1787 the Framers voted unanimously to have the method they used, called a Bill of Attainder, made illegal and forever banned. They also voted unanimously that it could never be made legal by state or Federal means. It violates the Constitution’s separation of powers and due process. It claims an individual or group is guilty and not allowed legal representation, doesn’t allow them to question witnesses or subpoena any. It is all one sided and is able to declare innocent people guilty. It’s exactly what the Dems did. Pelosi et al say they had to follow the Constitution and what the Framers wanted?? She and the Dems did exactly the opposite. They need to be held accountable for this dishonesty and lawlessness. Vote them out, at the very least.
    I first heard about the Bill of Attainder (an action) from David Rivkin, who was legal advisor to Reagan and GHW Bush. He said it was never an impeachment; it was the illegal Bill of Attainder. It’s been in the Constitution as banned since 1787, again, all by unanimous vote by the Framers. Google it. It’s a perfect description of what the Dems did to President Trump, and want to continue doing. In Constriction under Article 1, Section 9.

    Shame on them and what they illegally put the President and American citizens through, besides the cost and time wasted, not getting needed work done.

  16. What the Dems did is ILLEGAL. And it’s in the Constitution as such. In 1787 the Framers voted unanimously to have the method they used, called a Bill of Attainder, made illegal and forever banned. They also voted unanimously that it could never be made legal by state or Federal means. It violates the Constitution’s separation of powers and due process. It claims an individual or group is guilty and not allowed legal representation, doesn’t allow them to question witnesses or subpoena any. It is all one sided and is able to declare innocent people guilty. It’s exactly what the Dems did. Pelosi et al say they had to follow the Constitution and what the Framers wanted?? She and the Dems did exactly the opposite. They need to be held accountable for this dishonesty and lawlessness. Vote them out, at the very least.
    I first heard about the Bill of Attainder (an action) from David Rivkin, who was legal advisor to Reagan and GHW Bush. He said it was never an impeachment; it was the illegal Bill of Attainder. It’s been in the Constitution as banned since 1787, again, all by unanimous vote by the Framers. Google it. It’s a perfect description of what the Dems did to President Trump, and want to continue doing. In Constriction under Article 1, Section 9.

    Shame on them and what they illegally put the President and American citizens through, besides the cost and time wasted, not getting needed work done.

  17. There is also a mutual agreement treaty signed into law by Fmr. President Clinton in 1998 and adopted in 2000 regarding corruption in Ukraine, I wonder why that has not come up in the trial with the exception of Rand Paul that brought it up?

  18. There is also a mutual agreement treaty signed into law by Fmr. President Clinton in 1998 and adopted in 2000 regarding corruption in Ukraine, I wonder why that has not come up in the trial with the exception of Rand Paul that brought it up?

Comments are closed.