4

On Thursday, the whistleblower’s redacted 9-page complaint was released by the House Intelligence Committee. It identifies “multiple” White House sources and officials as informants as the whistleblower admits in the complaint that he did not have a first-hand account with the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky.

The “informants” have left the White House questioning who is speaking in such a way about the President on official business to sources? Trump has even gone so far as to insinuate it is spy behavior.


Advertisement

The New York Times reported today that “according to three people familiar” with the whistleblower’s identity, they are a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to work at the White House “at one point.” However, “the man has since returned to the C.I.A., the people said. Little else is known about him.”

Lawyers for the whistleblower have refused to confirm that he worked for the C.I.A. and said “publishing information about him was dangerous” yet yesterday they announced he was willing to testify, so long as his legal counsel would be allowed in the hearing.

The whistleblower’s complaint made it very clear that he was not on a team that handles calls with foreign leaders, but that he learned of Trump’s “conduct” only “in the course of official interagency business.”

Watch: Devin Nunes Rips Adam Schiff

Previous article

Republicans Demand Whistleblower’s Sources, as Inconsistencies in Complaint Materialize

Next article

You may also like

  • Linda says:

    There should be a way to reprimand a congressman or senator who accuses my President…of anything they cannot prove…I am so tired of them being able to say just anything without consequences …

  • Hmmm. I thought the informant was a former FBI or CIA agent that was suspected of working for George Soros while an acting FBI or CIA agent and is no longer an FBI or CIA agent but is currently employed by George Soros. Since this source isn’t a FIRST hand whistle blower but given Executive Privilege information by stated multiple current government officials, is it safe to say the names of the many current government officials talking to this individual aren’t protected whistle blower a and open to being named and prosecuted?

  • Patsy says:

    The Whistleblower should be prosecuted immediately for spying and promoting a coup against President Trump. The swamp is deep and wide.

  • Ed Dowling says:

    I agree 100%.